Its VSDoc man... boy! Good ole daysAnd Royal Enfield claims that everyone stops for the Bullet, including the train, want to try that out personally at a nearby railway crossing?
Now stop behaving like a troll, and lets get back to the topic!


Its VSDoc man... boy! Good ole daysAnd Royal Enfield claims that everyone stops for the Bullet, including the train, want to try that out personally at a nearby railway crossing?
Now stop behaving like a troll, and lets get back to the topic!
HA HA HA HA...I don't know man. I am all over the net past few days on the Duke and now this. Can't really recall so I'll concede this one to you. Good point!
Knock that lump down and post the source of the mileage bit you had been going on about for a while now!
Don't tell me that you guys didn't knew where to look for, any thing good related to Bajaj product.I don't know man. I am all over the net past few days on the Duke and now this. Can't really recall so I'll concede this one to you. Good point!
So the corrected figure is 54 and not 58.If that is not all, the Pulsar 220 in the IDC was rated at about 38kmpl while the new 200 NS is rated at 54kmpl
Oh my bad. I though, this being Pulsar thread, we were talking about Pulsar.I wasn't asking for source for the FE of 200NS, but rather the 30kmpl figure he had been quoting for the 200 Duke
For IDC numbers of KTM, you know where to go. You buddy in the automobile industry would be having the numbers with him. While, you talk to him, also ask him with Pulsar200 leaving every other bike dead, will he buy it or the KTM200/CBR250. I need to make a decision.This IDC thing I have been seeing a lot. A research website. Any link to where on it can I get figures for the KTM Duke?