General photography questions!
- Thread starter zack2137
- Start date
zack2137
Leh'd and how!
Apples and oranges!
iamsomnath
Where is the remote?
All for a healthy diet.Apples and oranges!
Anyway , what is your conclusion? Would love to see some images as well, in the line of this discussion.
iamsomnath
Where is the remote?
Stuck in a traffic snarl, read the article, usually stay miles away from such techie stuff. In paragraph 4.3.... coincidentally the author has also dabbled into a bit of apples and oranges stuff. Couldn't follow the article , oh so arcane. But the conclusion made a bit of sense, larger sensor allows better subject isolation. Known this all these years though
zack2137
Leh'd and how!
Actually, the conclusion is, larger sensors allow more room to play with unless the FL on the smaller sensor is equivalent. Since FX is capturing a larger frame, you've better control on the DOF.
Also how on a larger sensor you can zoom in more and derive shallow DOF at higher aperture numbers.
iamsomnath
Where is the remote?
Which brings us back to square one. Have you noticed a three words sentence in that article , " can't beat physics". That has also made sense to me
zack2137
Leh'd and how!
Ditto, but as the Brits say, horses for courses!
Can't carry a 3kg setup any longer so I'll opt for a pocket camera and live the compromise
iamsomnath
Where is the remote?
I was just ranting in general. I have read your reasons for a shift earlier and that made sense. Perhaps I congratulated you too for knowing what do you need.Ditto, but as the Brits say, horses for courses!
Can't carry a 3kg setup any longer so I'll opt for a pocket camera and live the compromise
Cheers
Over and out
zack2137
Leh'd and how!
Yes you did. Cheers.
Ankur003
UltraWideLife.com
Okay no more technical stuff. Few years back I was on a vacation. I was using two camera Nikon D3200 with 50mm 1.4G (APSC) and Canon G7X (1") simutaneously.
Canon G7X was a perfect all rounder. Great reach, colors, clarity, low noise performance, compact.