cat
Senior Billi
Well, you could spend a few days, unpleasantly, reading the two threads on the one India travel forum. Much confusion, the way it was implemented, although I guess it's settled down by now. Yes, Travisa has a bad reputation. Fortunately for me, the outsourced service here in SA is ok, I hear.
What you have to do is provide proof that the multiple entries are for bona fide purposes (Nepal and back into India, family arrangements, and so on.) Unfortunately, Travisa seems to make that more difficult than it should be. (Than it is for people in other countries, with different visa service providers.)
There was much heated argument and discussion on that forum over what the reason - or reasons - were. It comes down to this: Dawood Headley used a multiple entry visa when planning the Mumbai jihad attack and the authorities were pressured to do something about that system. Secondly, there had been increasing awareness and concern about how many foreigners were abusing the system so as to effectively reside in India (Goa), more-or-less permanently. (Note: Dawood Headley had used a business visa, not a tourist visa.)It really depends on how much the powers that make these decisions in India want to encourage or discourage tourism. Different countries make different decisions on this and I respect that.
What you have to do is provide proof that the multiple entries are for bona fide purposes (Nepal and back into India, family arrangements, and so on.) Unfortunately, Travisa seems to make that more difficult than it should be. (Than it is for people in other countries, with different visa service providers.)
Last edited: